ZERO
POINT
| Zero Point Radio Show |
Crises
of Humanity |
Critiques of 'New Think' |
New
World DisOrder |
Truth
Media & Resources |
March 14, 2011
Fabled
Airplanes The Role
of the Corporate Media in Creating and
Perpetuating the Mass Hypnosis of the American Public A Investigative
Psychological and Forensic Examination of the September
Clues Video Series by Christopher
P. Holmes, Ph.D. (Psych) Table
of Contents Abstract The September Clues
Video Series The Corporate Media’s
Live
Coverage of the Fabled Airplane Slamming into the South
Tower CNN-The
most trusted name in news CBS WNYW
FOX 5 NBC WBII-Channel
5 Pentagon and
Shanksville
Absurdities Amateur Videos of the
Fabled
Airplane Striking the South Tower The Supernatural
Physics of
Disappearing Airplanes Eye-Witnesses to the
First Fabled
Airplane 17 Seconds 9/11’s COLOURFUL TV
broadcasts
and Mask Edges Forged Out—The Amateur
Videos Hoax for Export The Epilogue Evidence for Airplanes
or for a Criminal
Media? Who Owns the Media? Do the Media do their
Job? Reclaiming America: Application of the Anti-Terrorist Legislation
to the Corporate Media Abstract If the
true perpetrators of these horrendous 9-11 crimes were actually brought
to justice
worldwide, this would indeed restore the wealth and abundance of this
Earth to
humankind and re-establish morality,
international law and justice within our societies.
This is the major opportunity for humankind
to transform this planet in a unified and spiritual way to awaken
humankind to
the multiple crimes against them being committed daily by these
insidious
cabals and as being consistently and very cleverly both hidden and
perpetrated
through the corporate media. 9-11 was
simply a case of Hollywood creativity and good old American corporate
media war
propaganda used to intentionally foster the creation of a 9-11 fable
and mythology—essentially
a delusional system which has been accepted by the masses of the
American
public.
The
September Clues Video Series The
whole of 9-11 was an obvious criminal concoction and fraud from start
to
finish, and there is such overwhelming evidence for this already, that
in some
ways, the issue of planes or no planes
is incidental and so has not been taken up generally by the 9-11
movement—considered
as a distraction, or at least, an issue that is not helpful towards
making a public
and scientific case against the official 9-11 story or waking up the
brain
damaged public. This logic and thinking
is however completely wrong and ill-informed, as indeed, the issue of
plane or
no plane is tied into a larger issue of whether or not the corporate
media
coverage was completely pre-scripted with
access to video lab technicians, sound studios, actresses to swoon and
actors
to bear false witnesses, and professional liars from think-tanks
marched out to
influence, persuade and deceive, as is their trade. The corporate
media actively staged this event! This
is the only possible explanation for all the
peculiarities and
anomalies, lies and deceits of their coverage, as will be presented in
this
article. In my view, this could be
proven in any impartial court before any half competent judge, anywhere
in the
world, which unfortunately no longer exists. While
the American people were sleeping, they came and stole it all away—your
country, your truth and constitution, the dignity of your dead, your
houses,
monies, pensions, jobs, health and lives. But
let us return to that day of infamy, 9-11, and
critically evaluate how
your favourite corporate media helped to mass murder your countrymen,
while
traumatizing a nation and intentionally deceiving you—or at least, most
of you. The
Corporate Media’s Live Coverage of the Fabled Airplane Slamming
into South Tower Coverage “When
criminals have unlimited access to instruments of mass persuasion, Solid
proof of their crimes are hard to expose. On
September 21, 2001 Almost
all pieces of evidence were quickly removed In
fact, all but ONE It
is spread all over America on tapes recorded by American families. And Verifiable on
Official TV
Archives www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive
CNN-The
most trusted name in news Winston:
Yea, I am. But I’d say the huge, the hole is, let me just go and get a
better
look, right now. (We then hear the
sounds of Winston shuffling about as if going to have a look and some
indistinguishable voice in the background.) Host:
Ok, go ahead. Winston:
The uh, I’d say, the hole takes about, (plane
enters the screen here, crosses to the left and disappears behind the
tower) it
looks as though six or seven floors were taken out …
and there’s more explosions right now,
hold on. People are running …
, hold on Host:
Hold on just a, we have an explosion inside. Winston:
The building is exploding right now, you got
people running up the street, I am going to go and see what is going
on. Host:
Ok, er, just put Winston on pause there for just a moment. These
are all major issues! The momentary
blackout, the discoloured artificial looking airplane and backdrop, the
failure
of the host to see an airplane, which must also have been visible for
seconds
before the two seconds on the screen, and the entirely suspect report
of
Winston that he is hearing massive explosions while his phone call
shows him to
be a liar and poor actor. His ‘shuffling
about’ is overheard but not a peep out of his explosions. In sum,
the folk at CNN have some interesting explaining to do.
This footage cannot conceivably be accepted
as evidence of the existence of a passenger airliner hitting the second
tower,
no matter how much CNN proclaims to be—the
most trusted name in news. CBS In the
CBS footage, the most outrageous elements of their studio work involve
the
conversation ongoing while this plane drops down out of the sky in the
background. The host Bryant Gumbel has
his producer’s wife, Teresa Renaud, on the telephone live from Chelsey,
a
subdivisions of Manhattan north of Towers, past the other subdivisions
of Tribeca,
Greenwich Village and Soho. This is the
conversation proceeding during the time that the fabled airplane
strikes the
second tower. Mrs.
Renaud: Good morning. How are you? Host:
This is Bryant Gumbel, I am down at 59th and 5th,
where
are you? Mrs
Renaud: I am in Chelsey and we are at, er, 8th and 16. We
are the
tallest building in the area and we, my window faces south. So it looks directly onto the World Trade
Centre. And I would say, you know,
approximately
ten minutes ago, there was a major explosion from probably it looks
like about the 80th floor, it
looks like it has
effected probably four to eight floors. Ur, major
flames are coming out of the, lets see,
the north side and also the east side of the building, yes. Host:
Yes, Um, you’re over in Chelsey? Um, did
you hear the explosion from your position? Mrs
Renaud: Oh, yes, yes we did. As
a matter of fact, we we heard it and and cause
I was just like standing there, pretty much looking out the window, I
didn’t see
what caused it or if there was an impact. Host:
So you have no idea right now ... Mrs
Renaud: Oh, there’s another one, another
plane just hit. Oh my God, another plane
just has just hit another building, flew right into the middle of it.
Explosion. The
claim further that she witnessed this second plane hitting the building
is a
complete fabrication. Firstly, why does
she not mention a plane until after the explosion and not before. It is only after the explosion that she
reports ‘another plane.’ No media
newscaster or cameraman sees the airplane before it hits the building
or reacts
to anything prior to when the explosions have already occurred, which
it seems
is what they take as their ‘cues.’ Further,
the second plane hit the building on the opposite
side from her
line of sight, and the manner in which it dive bombed down from above,
would
not possibly have enabled her to see that it was a plane that set off
the
explosion. Simply take the police to Mrs
Renaud’s apartment and take photographs from there to document the
possibility
of these things. Of
course, there are other anomalies in the conversation.
Firstly, why does she refer to ‘we’ as
hearing the explosion and then to “I” as standing at the window? Does she have a multiple personality disorder
or is there someone there to support her and guide her through her
acting bit,
but who is not to be mentioned? I
personally think that someone indicated to her so as not to say we, or
else she
just remembered and shifted her usage. Consider
her use of ‘I’ and ‘we’ in these
segments: “I am in Chelsey and
we are at, er, 8th and 16. We are the
tallest building in the area and we, my window faces south. … “ This makes sense as she is likely
referring
to ‘we’ as to indicate she and her husband, TV producer Jack Renault of
the Early Show, as people are apt to do in
using ‘we,’ although it is curious how it is then “my
window.” When asked if
she heard the explosion, Mrs Renault responds, “Yes, yes we
did,” and then she continues on, “As a matter of fact,
we we heard it and and
cause I was just like standing there, pretty much looking out the
window.” (By the way, these are
not typing errors,
but her actual word usage. I am not used to such phrases as “pretty
much looking out the window.”) Likely,
her producer husband is hiding away in Chelsey with her helping to
support her
through her acting ordeal and she is not supposed to refer to him, but
she
cannot help it due to her anxiety, uncertainty and the mechanical
speech automaticity
of referring to ‘we.’ Another
curious feature of this segment is the ‘swooning’ of some fine
actresses in the
studio produced to document the dramatic crashing of the fabled
airplane into
the second Tower. When I hear these
swoons, they sound more feigned than real to me, as if part of a
dramatization
and produced on cue. Of
course, these are my comments simply on the conversation ongoing while
the
fabled airplane appears and disappears very quickly in the background. However, overall, I would have to consider
that this CBS segment offers evidence of conspiracy to commit mass
murder to
ensure one’s corporate media status, but no credible evidence to
establish the
existence of any fabled airplane. In the September
Clues series, at the end of
the CBS coverage, the film maker has inserted a photo of an individual,
David
Handschuh, a witness who maintains, “I
didn’t see the plane although I was right below the tower.” David is shown against a backdrop photo of
an
explosion outwards from the South Tower but no evidence of an airplane. Of course, David was below the Tower, truly
on the scene—instead of a mile away in Chelsey wondering how WE did.
WNYW
FOX 5 Once
again, the whole clip is less than a minute in length, but within this
period,
the half-competent technicians make such profound mistakes that it is
almost
ludicrous—demonstrating conclusively that the images being presented
were being
fashioned within a video studio and an image of an airplane has simply being superimposed over the background
of the Towers. Of all evidences, this
clip is the most damming evidence of the media’s
fabrication of the airplane images. Of
course, if there was really an airplane, then there
would be no need
for such a fabrication. This
clip begins with the helicopter miles away from the Towers with a
panoramic
view of New York, showing the skyline for miles to the right of the
Tower, the
direction the fable airplane is supposed to come from.
However, in the opening panoramic view there
is no airplane at six seconds before impact. The
cameraman then zooms in on the Towers in three steps,
getting a
closer and closer look. However, it is
only after the cameraman has zoomed up the final time that suddenly an
airplane
appears on the screen as if from nowhere. No
one noticed the airplane ahead of time, of course
because there was
nothing to see from the opening panoramic view. The
host even says afterwards “the plane went
right through the other
tower,” giving recognition that he also had seen this nose out
shot. Of
course, he shouldn’t have reported that and no one claimed subsequently
to see
the nose of an airplane sticking out of the other side of the Tower,
although
that is shown in their video. At least,
it is shown for just a moment before they go to their infamously clever
black
out. Once
again, we have a Fade to Black just after the moment of impact, or
rather of
the explosion. The fade out of the video
feed is in three phases and lasts for 15 frames. There
is then a three frame fade in. This is
time enough to try to hide the nose
out shot and resume a natural coverage of events. How ridiculous is
this, to
have such blackouts at these moments of impact or studio mischief. This
whole video clearly documents the fabrication of this fabled airplane.
Such
preposterous images cannot possibly be taken as serious evidence of
this
so-called fabled airplane. No airplane,
largely of aluminium, can pass through a steel framed building without
impedance and emerge intact on the other side. And
then, it is not even visible to anyone afterwards as
sticking out of
the building! These shots alone of
the
fabled airplane reveal the farce of what the public came to accept. Even
more absurd in regards to the ‘nose out’ shot, concerns how this clip
from Fox
is then replayed by supposed rivals (and co-conspirators) at CNN within
six
minutes of being presented on Fox. However,
when these images of the airplane entering and
exiting the
south tower are replayed on CNN, the banner at the bottom of the CNN
screen is
used to obscure all the critical images of the airplane including the nose out shot. However, the
hosts on CNN actually say such
things on air as: “Well there
you see it, a second airplane hitting the South Tower.” However, despite saying this, they are
completely obscuring the actual image of the airplane by their banner,
so that we
don’t actually see anything of any airplane! They
are just telling us that we are seeing it, so that we
will think
that that is we saw. As it
happens, the original Fox videos “have
been remixed” and the critical nose-out shot is now removed from
their
archives. Of course, this is just
further evidence of the fraud they have helped to perpetrate, their
fabrication
of evidences, the obstruction of justice and the destruction of
evidence—against themselves. Of course,
these days, the US has become a completely lawless insane nation, a
nation of
double speak and mass lunacy. Fox
anchor, Jim Ryan offers the only truthful comment of the Fox coverage. He remarks, “I think we have a terrorist act
of proportions that we cannot begin to image at this juncture.” Yes, Mr Ryan was certainly right, as the
mass
of the American public had not even begun to imagine who the true
terrorists really
were. Instead the corporate media already
had some patsies lined up—Mr. Osama Bin Laden and his unholy warriors,
recovering
from strip bars, alcohol and cocaine in the days before, but leaving
Korans
behind. Jim Ryan’s coworkers then offer
a chorus of “Oh my God,” “My
goodness, a second plane has crashed into
the other tower …” My God, we
had
not imagined, although it seems that at least some of those within the
corporate
media had and knew full well what they were doing on that day when they
sealed
their fates. NBC WBII-Channel
5 Just as
the fabled airplane hits the building, one of the female new hosts is
stating, “I believe that could be a police helicopter
that is, OH, WOW…,” while a second female anchor then comes quickly
online
to correct this, stating, “We just saw
another of what I believe was a plane.” It
is of course useful to have such clarifying
statements from our
media personnel to inform us of what “we” just saw. This
concludes the opening analysis of the live shots of the 9-11 fabled
airplane
hitting the South Tower. This material
covered
here thus far is only about 15 minutes in length of the hour and a half
of the September Clues series and we are still only
on part B of the series. The results
of
our analysis thus far must, by any sane logic, be supportive of what
the film
editor concludes on screen: 9/11
TV was
one big lie. It is
simply not the case that there are one or two oddities, peculiarities
or
anomalies in the live coverage shots of the fabled second airplane, and
in the
variants of these shots later inserted into the news coverage. Instead, every one of the five clips presents
numerous inexplicable elements in the depictions of the airplane and in
the
conversations ongoing within the studios, and with supposed
eye-witnesses. Further, the different
shots are even
inconsistent with each other. This
concludes what I have most wanted to focus upon in my presentation on
this September Clues series—the original live
coverage of a fabled airplane hitting the South Tower.
In the days, weeks and years after, other amateur
videos emerged, supposedly turned in by objective witnesses at the
scenes but
these also show all kinds of other anomalies. What
appears to be most likely is that the news networks
simply had
individuals ready to film the second explosion in the South Tower from
different perspectives when it happened, so that airplanes could
subsequently
be inserted or overlaid onto their videos which captured the actual
events—which
were the interior explosions.
Pentagon
and Shanksville Absurdities “I
saw this plane, a jet, an American Airliner jet, coming, and I thought
this
doesn’t add up. It’s really low, and and
I saw it, it just went, I mean, it was like er, a cruise missile with
wings.” This in
itself is already peculiar. Why does
Mike say in one line that it is an American Airliner jet and then in
the next
line, describe it as being like a ‘cruise missile with wings?’ This is patently absurd. [1] However, Mike later does another interview to
explain again what he witnessed. I
looked up and I saw the jet banking, and er clearly, you see the AA on
the side
and I knew it was American Airlines jet, and er, it went into a steep
decline
and accelerated. Boom, right into the
Pentagon, the side of the Pentagon. And, and the wings on the jet just
folded
back and it just kind of crumbled, it kind of came together like an
accordion
and just pierced the wall of the Pentagon. There was this huge … Boom. Mike is
then shown repeating his tale once again and trying to discredit all
the
questions and rumours circulating concerning his report.
He wants then to “set the record straight.” Now he works for WUSA- TV 9 NEWS NOW in
Washington and he
feels
compelled to explain his story once more to fellow television employees. Basically,
the only reason that I am doing this, is because (visible gulp) over
the last
five years, I have been getting a lot of phone calls, emails and, and
my words
have been twisted, and I figure that if you are going to the internet
for
information, then go and find the right information.
One other suggestion, keep an open mind, but
always try to get the facts. [1] Actually, this is not too absurd, but it is
Walter’s later statements which are absurd. The
Citizen’s Investigative Committee (December 2010) has
produced a
film documentary which seems to establish that there was indeed a
passenger
type aircraft which passed north of the route usually depicted as the
flight
path of the fabled airplane, and which approached the Pentagon
extremely low
but then veered off and ascended. This
is a different flight path than that depicted where the light poles on
the
highways were knocked over, which was staged. So
the fact that people may have been witness to a large
passenger plane
at the Pentagon is still consistent with the thesis that there were no
airplanes actually destroyed on that ill-fated day, when the elites
sealed
their fate. Also, Walters might have
been confused as having legitimately seen both, although not in the way
he
describes. Striking
the South Tower Part
C of September
Clues is entitled ‘Flying Elephants’
and deals with a first sample of the amateur
videos of the
second fabled airplane. (Part F of the
series later deals more extensively with the amateur videos, see Forged Out.) These are
reportedly shot by “the man on the street.” In all, there are now at least 36 of such
efforts. However, as pointed out by the
film editor, “A back-to-back comparison
shows how they all disqualify each other.” He
then documents obvious inconsistencies and
absurdities. The
first amateur video is called the “Al-Quaeda shot,” reportedly found by
the FBI
on the Al-Quaeda website—or should we say the CIA-aeda website. This tape shows a dark charcoal coloured
airplane on a horizontal path for about three seconds before striking
the South
Tower. This is then directly compared
with the ‘dive bomber scenario’ which shows a breathtakingly steep
descent with
a G-force levelling within the last seconds. These
trajectories cannot both be true. And if
so many of these evidences of a second plane are fraudulent, the
simplest
explanation is that there must not have been an airplane at all, as
then there
would not have been any need to fabricate such evidences.
If one is presenting the truth, it is all so
simple. Creating and maintaining a
delusional system is more complex and requires such video labs,
software and
computer expertise, half-competent technicians, Hollywood whores and
the
pathological liars of the corporate media. The
methods of the news media and Hollywood
itself can easily produce such image files and deceptions, and do it
routinely. What a
joke. The only way to explain all the
anomalies on the amateur videos, the most simple and parsimonious way,
is to
conclude that they are all simply fabricated evidences intentionally
created to
deceive and confuse the public and to mix with other authentic pictures. (We
will examine more of these amateur videos and who produced them in a
later
section, Forged Out, as presented in
part E of the series.) Part C
of September Clues also raises the
important issue of how a supposedly real airplane with wings and a tail
of
aluminium was able to seamlessly enter right into the steel framed
South Tower,
so completely and without obstruction, such that it then completely
disappeared
from view. There are no photos of the
hole in South Tower as showing any evidence of an airplane inside. Further, no parts of the airplane broke off
and fell to the ground upon impact, as one would certainly expect of
the weaker
aluminium wing and tail structures. In
fact, the motion of the airplane into the building shows no obstruction
to its
flight path at all! The ‘nose out shot’
discussed earlier showed the motion of the plane right through the
whole
building in a jiffy in a completely unobstructed manner.
These are either instances of Divine
Intervention, new methods of dematerializing material entities or more
simply,
half-competent video technicians. Most
peculiar is one of the amateur videos depicting an airplane directly
entering
into the South Tower. On one frame of the video, the left wing has
completely
disappeared and yet there still is no hole there in the Tower. The timing is slightly off.
This same video also shows synchronized
explosions both above and below the right wing as it enters the
building. These explosions could not be
caused by the
wings but are obviously evidence of planted charges, which were not
obscured by
the superimposed image of the airplane. Of
course, it is much simpler to fake an airplane entering right into a
building,
than it is to show a non-uniform crash with parts breaking off upon
impact. The fabled airplane just slips
into the building so nicely and tidy, simply vanishing!
Isn’t that clever and cunning of them. People
sometimes wonder why the South Tower was blown up first, before the
North
Tower, since the latter had burned for longer. As
it happens, recordings of the emergency firemen
transmissions included
a fireman on scene who states that the fire was now confined to only a
few floors
and that with two more hoses, they would likely be able to get it under
control. Of course, it would have been
embarrassing to have had the fireman arriving on scene at the hole and
finding
no airplane! The demolition of the South
Tower had to be first as the firemen in their bravery and selfishness
were
about to deal with the first emergency. Of
course, they had no idea that the whole building was
pre-wired for a
controlled demolition and that to the likes of Kissinger, they are
nothing more
than the soldiers, “stupid, dumb animals” to be used
as pawns in the game plans and strategies of the
criminal psychopaths
who high-jacked America. The Architects
and Engineers for 9-11 Truth
should attempt to model impacts of such aluminium airplanes passing
into steel
frame buildings and determine how such an impact would really unfold. This scenario of the airplane entering into
the building without obstruction and then disappearing completely from
view is
another of those jokes in this whole 9-11 fraud. The
fact that these things are given any
credence documents the naivety and lack of common sense within the
American and
world public. It is as if people are so
used to the techniques of the road runner, cartoon characters, the
Simpsons and
impossible things, that they no longer have the intelligence to
question the
most obvious of frauds. Even the
sizes
of the holes left in the Towers barely accommodate the massive planes
which are
supposed to have slipped inside so cleverly and cleanly.
Of
course, all the planes on 9-11 vanished in one way or another. CNN live
featured Sean Murtagh, the vice president of finance and a CNN
producer, online
at 8:50 am after the explosion at 8:46. “I
just witnessed a plane that appeared to be cruising er slightly lower
than
normal altitude over New York City and it appeared to crash into, I
don’t know
which Tower it is, but it hit directly in the middle of one of the
World Trade
Centre Towers. … It was a jet, er,
it
looked like a two engine jet, er, maybe a 737. …
a large passenger commercial jet … “ Fox
News, a few minutes after the first strike, had on-line one of the
producers of “Fox Report,” Owen Moogan, on the
scene: I
am on the roof of my building which is about five blocks to the south
of the
world trade centre and I am looking right now at the World Trade Center. There is a massive gaping hole, er on the
second Tower. It’s unbelievable to look
at, there’s a massive hole Host:
It looks something like out of a movie. There
is a huge hole in the side of Tower number One, (the host correcting
Owen as to
what Tower has been hit.) Owen:
Tower One. (as if repeating
to himself so as to remember) Host:
Owen, your apartment is just a few blocks from it.
Did you hear anything? Owen:
I was lying in bed, ah, and all of a sudden I
heard what sounded like, er, a plane or something coming extremely low
and then
we just heard this shattering explosion, I came to the roof and … (cut
off) Um,
well I was leaving my house to go to work and I walked down the street
to go to
the subway. I was at the corner of
Franklin and West Broadway, and as I was approaching the subway, a
tremendous
roar, er, went over my head and I looked up immediately, and it was a
plane,
um, and much, lower than I have ever seen a plane in lower Manhattan. And it was a large plane, I couldn’t (cough)
identify it as anything specific, except that it was a commercial jet
certainly.
Um and it, it, my eyes followed it because this is approximately
fifteen blocks
from the world trade centre and it, it just slammed right into it and
it was
completely engulfed by the building. It
was extraordinary. No wings flew
off. Nothing like that.
It just went directly in creating this cavern
like hole. It reminds you of the worst
kinds of effects in movies, but you are reassured that you are watching
a movie
… that it’s an effect, but this is not. I
am actually uptown at 86th and Riverside. I can see the
World Trade
Centre from about half the building up to the top, and about five
minutes ago,
as I was watching the smoke, er, a small plane, I, it looked like a
propeller
plane came in from the west, and um, about twenty or twenty five
stories below
the top of the centre, it disappeared for a second and then exploded,
um,
behind a water tower so I couldn’t tell whether it hit the building or
not. But
it was very visible that a plane had come in at a low altitude and
appeared to
crash into the World Trade Centre. The
problem for such scripted witnesses, in my view, is that they were
trying to
describe what they haven’t really seen but they know approximately what
they
were supposed to have seen or to report. The September
Clues series then shifts focus
and offers a clip from 41 seconds after the second fabled airplane
strike. The news anchor is explaining that
“key
suspects” come to mind, Osama boogie man Bin Laden and “who
knows what.” This host
then has on air another firsthand witness, Eric Shawn, a FOX TV
terror expert and war
correspondent,
with connections inside the FBI. This is
again peculiar. Eric reports hearing a
jet, although he doesn’t say he saw it, and then he seems to hear it go
right.
He describes it as ‘making a right,’ as if it were an automobile which
can make
a turn in seconds. Of course, the fact
of a second airplane raised the ‘spectre
of an intentional terrorist attack’ and Eric was certainly the
right man to
have on live as an eye-witness. As
he is giving his report, Fox is listing
some of Eric’s areas of involvement in covering stories, including the
93 WTC
bombings (involving the FBI), the Waco siege, TWA flight 800, the
Anthrax
Treat, and lastly, but most importantly the “hunt
for Bin Laden.” O, how clever
and
cunning. Jim
Friedl, an unidentified unknown individual, provides a key element to
the
creation of the disappearing airplane myth. He
is more definite in what he says and saw, especially
how the plane “went directly inside the building.” Jim is
featured on CNN on Good Day America and left
unidentified: Dick
Oliver, a reporter from the street, is on line with NY
Good Day and provides another angle on the day’s events for
Fox. Jim,
I don’t know if we have confirmed it, if this was an aircraft, or, to
be more
specific some people said they thought
they saw a missile. But I don’t know how people could differentiate but
we
might leave open the possibility that this was a missile attack on
these
buildings. Mark
Obenhaus, -- ABC Senior Producer Owen
Moogan—Fox Senior Producer Sid
Bedingfield—CNN Executive Vice President Richard
Davis—CNN Executive Vice President new Standards and Practices Rose
Arce—CNN Producer Jeanne
Yurman—CNN reporter Winston
Mitchell—ABC/CNN Producer Eric
Shawn—FOX TV Senior Correspondent Jennifer
Oberstein—Ritz-Carleton Hotels/NBC tour operator Jane
Derenowski—MSNBC Producer Dr.
Jay Adlersberg—ABC medical reporter Elliot
Walker—NBC NEWS reporter Theresa
Renaud—wife of CBS producer Jack Renaud (the Early Show) Mark
D. Birnbach – FOX TV employee Mike
Walter – USA Today Reporter Joel
Sucherman—USA Today.com Editor Steve
Anderson—USA Today, dir. of communications Fred
Gaskins—USA Today national editor Jim
Friedl (unidentified) This is quite a
listing of
corporate media executives, producers and reporters.
The only exceptions are Jennifer Oberstein,
who worked for a Hotel associated with NBC tours, and Jim Friedl, an
unknown, a
defining witness to the fabled airplane disappearing into the building.
Of course, the September Clues series is only
presenting brief samples of material from media coverage and it is most
certain
that if we could access and analyze all the clips and tall tales of the
day, we
would likely find all kinds of additional anomalies.
Every witness seems fraudulent one way or
another in what they are reporting, in their language and details. Certainly, the ‘fabled airplanes’ were
eye-witnessed live on-line that
fateful day of 9-11 by quite a clan of primarily media
insiders, news reporters and producers, some on the way up we
might say. The eye-witness
testimony to the
quantum airplanes, which are large, midsized, small and like a missile
and
entering directly into the building, while bouncing off it, and all
such
non-sense, simply cannot stand as credible documentation for a fabled
airplane. It is much more likely that it
is all contrived, intentionally deceptive so as to create conflicting
stories,
but then to arrive at the official account to be illustrated over and
over
again with the best bits of the video image pools.
The witnesses are simply not credible in
their descriptions, their speech and stories. Of course, the media’s
attitude
is likely that all the uncertainties will simply be forgotten and left
for the
conspiracy theorists, who can argue over missiles, airplanes or what
type of
craft it was. 17
Seconds Part
E of the September Clues series (which
begins at
41.45 seconds into the 1.31 hours) is entitled 17 Seconds
and it features an analysis of strange bleeps and sound
markers on different network sound tracts, which suggest co-ordinated
timing
between studios. There are several
instances of this. The 17 seconds refers
to the time
between the official 9/11 commission time of the second explosion
established
at 9:03:11 and the seismic data which recorded the explosion at 9:02:54. The film editor suggests that the TV airing
time was thus delayed by 17 seconds compared with the real events—a
‘safeguard
buffer’ between the actual events and the TV airing.
All five networks had
synchronized audio clues which occurred 17 seconds before the moment of
the
explosion in the South Tower. The first of these
shown occurs
during the ABC coverage with guest Dan Dahler online.
It occurs just as Dahler is saying “we’re
seeing,” which is 17 seconds before the visible explosion in the South
Tower. Don is ‘on scene’ and describing
the fire and smoke from the first explosion in the North Tower. One wonders why there is no background noise
from Don’s phone or evidence of the explosion in the South Tower. After the explosion, the TV host states,
“That looks like a second plane,” which the audience has just seen on
the
video. However, Dan Dahler actually
states, “I did not see a plane go in,
that just exploded.” Of course,
Dan
did not likely know what was unfolding and naively described his actual
ongoing
perception of the scene. He was there
and he did not see an airplane, but only an explosion.
The staff at the ABC network were able to see
an airplane however, along with the viewing audience. The film editor then
compares the
ABC video of the 17 seconds before the explosion with the FOX TV
footage. Fox has a ‘audio surge’ which
matches the
ABC’s Twin Beep in synch, duration and spacing. He
then compares ABC & CBS, which are sharing at
times, offset
camera feeds, and the CBC audio surge again matches the ABC twin beep
in synch,
duration and spacing. However, the video
streams are off about 3.6 seconds. Next,
the ABC coverage is compared with CNN, where again
the images and
cues are offset by 2.5 seconds, but both again have audio clues at the
beginning and end of a 17 second timeframe. In
this case, there are synchronized ‘snap sounds’ at the
ends of these
clips. NBC then has ‘a glitch’ at the
beginning of the 17 seconds, which glitch is caused by sloppy video
editing. ABC and NBC then have identical
‘slam’ sounds at the end of the seventeen second period.
To explain these
peculiar
observations and the coincidental sound surges or sound markers at the
beginning and ends of these clips, the film editor asks if indeed ABC,
CBS,
FOX, CNN AND NBC were all five linked up. Or,
of course, these could be multiple coincidences for
the coincident
theorists, but it suggests something far more sinister.
The film editor asks, “Was the 9/11 TV
coverage run from a single Command Center? “ Certainly,
given the complexity of the hoax
perpetrated on 9-11, this was likely so. Part E of September
Clues then notes that the reason given for the BLACK OUT
of all the local TV stations was because the antennae were on the World
Trade
Centre. This knocked all local live
TV
coverage off the air. The editor
concludes: “No airplanes were highjacked
on 9/11, ONLY AIRWAYS.” September
Clues
then plays
a “curious audio incident on Fox TV.”
While the show is ongoing, a side
communication is clearly heard. A man’s
voice asks, “Grade 9, Chopper 5, anyone
on?” Chopper 5 refers to the Fox
News Helicopter 5. The Grade E-9 is a US
Navy ranking of a “Master-Chief Petty Officer.”
This segment ends with the editor’s comment: “Let’s
leave it at that.”
Part E next
illustrates the
multicoloured backgrounds and videos broadcast on TV that day in New
York,
which was a bright sunny day. The
corporate media TV images differed in tones as the white balance and
colour settings
were so varied. High-end equipment
can
maintain the natural colours of scenes, however not on that fateful day. Instead, the scenes range from yellowed, to
grey, purple, and blue hazes. The TV
networks had different colours despite having similar vantage points. Five different networks, five or more
different colours. The ABC “international
shot” of the second fabled airplane, shown to
international audiences, clearly presents phoney images.
Firstly, the edge of the Tower about to be
impacted is artificial and unnatural looking, with a partial visible
edge
extending along the length of the building. The
airplane image is somewhat distinct in shape, showing
basic
structures, but it is a most unnatural solid dark object with no
markings or
differentiations. It is really quite a
ridiculous image of an artificial airplane. Further,
it is on a blue and grey hazy background with no
resolution of
the city or skyline behind. When this
image of the airplane meets the artificial edge of the Tower, on
particular
frames there is still a slight line of light between the Tower and the
airplane, even though the plane is supposed to simply be going into the
Tower. At one point, the nose of the plane
is cut
off when it meets these edges. This is
an obvious fake. The airplane image and
the Tower images are somehow on different portions of the screen or on
different layers. This is a ridiculously
phoney image of a fabled airplane. Another
version of the same shot has a dark border along
the edge of the
towers, perhaps to obscure the details noted above.
However, this other version of the
international shot has the airplane causing pixel bleed on the Tower as
it is
supposedly passing behind. These are not
even good fakes. The film editor then
illustrates
one of his own productions of a bat-mobile, with Bat Man and Robin
passing
behind the Tower, just as the plane was shown to do in the corporate
media
footage. He actually does a better job
than the former, with no pixel bleed. Part E ends on the
note, Turn it Off, referring of course to your
own favourite TV. The images of both the
planes and the Towers are doctored in multiple ways. The first EVAN
FAIRBANKS shot is
taken from below the South Tower, framed with the upper profile of a
passer-by
in the foreground, who looks up towards the Tower in the clip just
after the
explosion. The airplane is more
naturally coloured, light and grey and fairly distinct.
The airplane slides ever so nicely into the
building without any seeming resistance or evidence of breaking apart. This clip produced a dramatic “shock
and awe” TV experience. The film editor then
begins to
examine the possibility of there having been a missile and how it might
have
been edited out and a plane inserted. However,
personally, although I do not consider the
‘missile
possibility’ completely disproved, I consider it highly unlikely and
unnecessary. What is simplest is simply to
have explosions and create the varied airplane images over recordings
of the
actual explosions from different angles. Anyway,
the editor suggests this first clip could have
been created in a
four step process: 1. Tower shot with real missile strike is filmed
from a
suitable location; 2. foreground street scenery is composed; 3. Tower
shot is
inserted with a reacting man to add some ‘life’ to the scene. September
Clues shows the layered edges
existing between the foreground and the Tower background, wherein the
hues and
lighting effects betray tampering; and 4. the superposition of an
airplane
image over the supposed missile. It
is
then shown how the plane enters the building so smoothly with no
deceleration
on impact. The producer of this
video was
amateur Evan Fairbanks of KSK Studios, whose vita describes his talents
as “Creative programming solutions for
television, interactive and multimedia;” certainly, a lucky man to
have on
the spot. The second amateur
video is
credited to Luc Courchesne, a Canadian 3D artist. This
is another dramatic video from right
underneath the airplane and the image of the plane is quite distinct,
although
its wings appear to be at impossible angles. By
the time this plane hits the building, it is almost
completely upside
down and then one of its wings disappears from view even before there
is yet a
hole in the Tower. Then it seems to have
a quarter wing section as it slips inside. The
left wing then disappears inside, but still no hole
and no
wing! Mr Luc Courchesne happens to be
the inventor of the “Panoscope 3E”, a
virtual reality program. Somehow, Mr
Courchesne’s program must allow for such quantum tunnelling effects,
whereby an
airplane wing can disappear into a building without obstruction. This is all quite clever but again quite
ridiculous. Dr. K.
Kahleel, in his article Brainwashed:
Proof of No Airplanes on 9-11, provides interesting notes on some
of these ‘men on the street’ who were the sources
for some of the so-called amateur videos. Dr.
K. notes: When
videographer Scott Freeman was asked repeatedly about the nature of his
video,
he said, essentially, “I don’t want to
talk about it anymore.” When
the pro-Zionist documentary film maker, Scott Meyers, who makes videos
which
demonize Muslims, was asked about his incriminating video, he
responded, “A guy gave it to me, can’t remember his
name.” When
videographer Evan Fairbanks was asked about the nature of his supposed
video,
he said it looked “surreal,” like a fame
made in Hollywood.” Part F then examines
three
different shots all variations of a “common matrix,” by three different
authors: Wolfgang Staehle, Robert Clark and Tina Cart.
These three shots are from the same
perspective, but in each case, the first provides the widest angle
view, then
the second, and third, but all from the same perspective but framed
differently! The film editor then
includes
these comments on screen: All
alleged authors of the “AMATEUR” shots
would be suitable scapegoats in the event that any of those forgeries
were
exposed. All could credibly be blamed
for having sought fame or fortune – and the case would be closed. In fairness, there was one exception to the
rule. His name is PAVEL HLAYA, a construction worker from
Czechoslovakia.” A clip then shows
Pavel on an ABC news show on
September 11, 2003. He is introduced as
an individual who happened to film both airplanes striking the Towers
on that
day, although he had not realized it for over six months.
The first shot was a distant view of an
object in the sky before the first strike and the second of his shots
was from
close under the Towers. However, as it
happens, in this strange universe, his 2nd shot is a re-edit
of the
Hezarkhani shot, although with different foreground buildings! Again, the Towers have the same unusual frame
edges on them. The editor then
provides a
quotation from the site www.mediacen.navy:mil/vi/comcam.htm. “Totally
imagery control of any terrain is a primary sector of modern
warfare.” Of course, most common
folk could not imagine anything so monstrous and deceptive. But the editor points out that “Fake broadcasting for war propaganda has
several historical precedents. Its
purpose is to generate popular support for waging mean and unpalatable
wars.” Of course, there were many
reasons why the
targets for 9-11 were as selected. Not
only was this a false flag terrorist event to whip up the frenzy and
patriotic
fervour of the public, but it was also to get rid of those monstrous
buildings. Previous applications for
controlled
demolitions of the Two Towers had been rejected and the city was
demanding the
removal of the asbestos from the buildings, a massive and expensive
project. 9-11 events were also staged to
destroy evidences
at the at the Navel Accounting unit in the Pentagon and as held in
Building 7
by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FBI and CIA, on Wall
Street
crimes and racketeering. There were
diverse and multiple reasons why 9-11 unfolded as it did and how the
media
shaped the minds of the sleeping public as to the course of events. Few people realize that the corporate media
play active roles in staging, scripting and covering over the crimes of
their
masters. Part
G of September Clues begins at 1:01
and is ten
minutes in length. It includes varied
subject matter and clips under the rubric of hoax for
export. The film editor opens
section G
with the comment:” We have seen how
missiles were most likely used on 9/11” and that this raises two
questions. I would like to comment here
again, that I do not agree with this suggestion and it is not
established by
the September Clues video and media
analysis. Certainly, there is more of a
possibility of a missile than there was of an airplane, but neither are
required if you have some video technicians, supportive actors and
actresses,
and planted charges. Anyway, the first
question is:
What happened to the 4 airplanes and their passengers?
In fact, according to the Federal Aviation
Association, Flight 93, which supposedly was downed in a hole in
Shanksville,
and Flight 175, which supposedly hit the South Tower, were only
deregistered on
September 28th of 2005. Of course, we have
reviewed over
a dozen of the varied videos of something, a quantum airplane exploring
different flight paths, colours, shapes and sounds, simultaneously, and
then
hitting the South Tower. And now, we
find out that this fabled airplane was not decommissioned until four
years
latter. Further, it turns out that no
airport logs exist for the other 2 airplanes, Flight 11 which was
supposed to
have flown into the North Tower to disappear inside, so nice and cozy; and Flight 77 which was the flight to ‘fold back it wings’ before disappearing
into the hole at the Pentagon. These
flights are not even recorded in the airport logs of the day! This is a somewhat remarkable fact. The film then questions, what happened to
their passengers, but if none of the planes were high jacked, then
something
else must have been done or arrangements made. The film doesn’t
explore this
issue but moves on to ask: Didn’t
people see a large plane from street
level? The answer provided is that “SOME DID (a small minority” and a web
address at www.checktheevidence.com (911/NYT9-11AccountsAnalysis). There is some video evidence of fly-by
jets in the area
and several
witnesses reported a missile. September
Clues
then
critically examines the Naudet brothers’ videos. These
two French Canadian videographers,
Jules and Gedeon, managed to capture both impacts of the fabled
airplanes. In fact, it is the only video
of the first
impact, other than the very distant image which turned up years later
on
Pavel’s camera. Their most famous
shot
of the first airplane is shown briefly but without much discussion. A number of features of this video are
somewhat peculiar. Firstly, the fireman
walking across the scene looks up towards the sky as if hearing
something, but
then he simply looks back down again. Of
course, in a real life emergency situation, such a dramatic airplane
spotting
in downtown New York is bound to engage an observer’s attention. Secondly, it is very odd how the film maker
is able to zoom in on the plane and follow it into the Tower, as though
he knew
all along what its path was supposed to be. Of course, the airplane in
this
video is also of very poor quality and it also enters swiftly into the
building
with no obvious obstruction or break up. The Naudet brothers’
video of the
second impact caught only an instant of a dark shape moving towards the
South
Tower on the opposite side of the building from their vantage point. This is a very disjointed clip as the camera
dances around before and after the impact. Further,
there are 3 unexplained cuts in the footage of
the dramatic
moments. By comparing their video with
other sequences of the event, the film editor is able to determine that
almost
30 frames are deleted. Further, their
video shows the north face of the South Tower as completely white, on
the
shaded side of the building, as it is seen in other clips.
This is clearly a fraud. These
video fabrications were the very core of the 9/11 TV hoax.
The corporate news media has proactively
supported this global scam bred in rogue power circles.
Beyond the clear evidence of video doctoring,
a close scrutiny of the 9/11 TV archives reveals a consistent pattern
of
FOREKNOWLEDGE and SCRIPTED NEWSCASTS. Part E then looks as
some of the
foreign footage which suggests such foreknowledge and scripted
newscasts. The first on BBC world has a
newscaster
lecturing Great Britain on the physics of the buildings collapse,
claiming
wrongly that the exterior walls of this building supported its weight,
instead
of interior columns. The airplane
crashes were thus able to weaken the buildings enough to cause their
collapse. The film script
reminds us that “we live in an Orwellian world.” Part
H (1:11) begins with a collage of 9/11
shots with all the discoloured backdrops and artificial scenes put to
music. It then shows varied shots of the
Towers against different backdrops, but where the backdrops seem to
move with
respect to the building. Obviously,
different
kinds of image layering have being used. Such
is evident in varied shots, where parts of the
surrounds are whitened
out, while others maintain some realistic details.
It is as if the scenes were composed with
different foregrounds and backgrounds being added as layers in the
final results. They then demonstrate
how even
the collapse sequences appear to have been tampered with.
The editor notes: “The variety of the video
trickery was designed to bewilder any
comparative analysis of it.” This
certainly applies to some of what were supposed to have been helicopter
shots,
which show numerous kinds of anomalies, suggesting even the use of
digitally
simulated buildings. All quite a
hodgepodge to be sure. Finally, the Epilogue, addresses five major questions. The first concerns the eyewitnesses on the
streets of Manhattan. As it happens, the
vast majority of witnesses did not report a large passenger plane. September
Clues then plays a sampling of such witnesses claiming to have seen
the
plane—all seemingly quite contrived and questionable, and then clips
where the
witnesses claimed to see a missile. The second question
asks: “What if someone had snapped a clear picture
of a missile hitting the WTC?” It is
then noted that “all New York cell-phones
blacked out on 9/11.” The official
cause given was network overload. No
digital pictures then. Secondly, as
reported on Italian TV, police officer Michael Pappas recounted that
during his
call on duty within the first hours of 9/11, they entered a store which
had
developed films with people’s names on in alphabetical order. A sign they viewed, read “Pick up
at September 11 at 10:00 AM.” The New
York Police had been collecting
people’s film rolls in the early hours of the attack!
How clever of them. The third frequently
asked
question concerns what caused those wide airplane shaped holes in the
Towers? The answer is suggested by
varied videos
which show synchronized explosions within the Towers.
This is evident in the clip of the first
strike and in a number of clips of the second. The forth frequently
asked
question, concerns where are the airplanes? The
video shows then parts of planes, supposedly, held at
the
Smithsonian Institute or as scattered on the street—but nothing
substantive
from any of the four sites. Lastly, what about the
families
of the passengers? Apparently 3 of the 4
flights were bound for the LAX, Los Angeles airport, but “It
is a FACT that grieving families and friend never showed up at the
LAX.” This could have included the
friends and family of 221 passengers. A
reporter on scene at the LAX reports that such survivors were
“beginning to
trickle in,” just at this moment, but none are evident within the
newscast. The announcer then notes that
LAX was being evacuated and shut down except for emergency services. Of course, there was no need to accommodate
grieving families and friends. The more
closely one examines the evidences for airplanes, the evidences slip
away like
sand in a sieve, to leave nothing substantive or conclusive. Instead, one finds massive evidences for
fraud, staged witnesses and soundtracks, half-competent image layering
techniques, and for conspiracies to commit mass murder.
The corporate media has intentionally helped
to ‘stage’ these events while
deceiving the world’s public. The
corporate media of America helped to create the mythology of high
jacked
airplanes causing the explosions within the Two Towers, and
subsequently of
causing the buildings to blow up and collapse. The
fabled airplanes were just another link in the whole
series of
absurdities expounded as part of the 9-11 mythology.
There
are many within the corporate media willing to mass murder their
countrymen if
it will advance their careers, earn them sexual favours, or line those
fancy pants
with lots of that American blood money. Concerning
the criminal evidence against the corporate news media for their
involvement in
staging 9-11, the September Clues
series clearly documents that the corporate media of America actually
helped to
carry out the 9-11 false flag terrorist event. They
actually conspired together and co-ordinated it all
with an army of
media men and women, and elements through the corrupted intelligence,
police and
military communities of America. What a
sad state of affairs and this criminally corrupted media daily spins
its
propaganda and deceptions. “Jews totally run
Hollywood.”
Stein proudly admits. He then goes on to provide a long, long list of
Hollywood/media chieftains—all Jews!—to prove his point.
On his list, Fox … Paramount Pictures … “Walt
Disney … Sony Pictures … Warner Brothers … CBS … MGM …NBC/Universal
Studios …
(I have excluded the specific names from Marrs’s listing, but these
were the
company associations). “As a proud Jew,” says Joel Stein, “I want America to know of our
accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood.” Stein
says he then called Abe Foxman, Chairman of the Jewish ADL, to ask him,
why
don’t more Jews just come out and boast at this great accomplishment?
Foxman
responded by admitting that yes, it’s true that most of the top execs “happen to be Jewish.” In
fact, Foxman told Stein, “all eight major film studios are
run by
men who happen to be Jewish.” Ben
Stein … the well-known Jewish actor, economic and writer, when asked “Do Jews run Hollywood?” stared blankly
at the questioner, then retorted, “You
bet they do—and what of it?” Shahar
Ilan, writing in haaretz.com, the internet division of Israel’s top
daily
newspaper, commented, “The Jews do
control the American media. This is very
clear, and claiming otherwise is an insult to common knowledge.” … So
powerful is the Jewish control over the media that Nathanael Kapner, a
rare Jew
who converted to Christianity and now is adept at reporting these
things,
asserts that no longer can we trust our local daily newspaper. Zionist Jews have taken over the ‘local
newspaper’ in America,” Kapner writes. “In the
contemporary world, organized American Jewish lobbying groups and
deeply
committed Jews in the media are behind the pro-Israel U. S. foreign
policy that
is leading to war against virtually the entire Arab world.” This
Zionist bias and propaganda spin by the Jewish-owned American media is
not new.
… …
Time magazine, Newsweek, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX—and many more are all
owned or
run by Jews and operated solely to further the aims of the traitorous,
anti-American, ever growing Zionist World Empire. All
America is in the Grip of the Hidden, Red Iron Fist of Zionism Of
course, the media, even as important as it is to our culture, is only a
bit
piece of the whole that is now, regrettably, under the big thumbs of
the Jewish
Zionist elite. Our educational
establishment, Wall Street, the banks, the Federal Reserve, our
Congress, the
White House …, and our judiciary—each and every one is infiltrated by
Zionist
radicals who put Israel and their own “Chosen People” first, to the
detriment
of everything sacred to honest, God-fearing, hard-working Americans. The
corporate media is well designed to deceive the American public
concerning all
major national and international events on a daily basis, to enable the
war
crimes of the American people against other nations around the world
over the
past fifty years; to enable the elites to poison the population through
inoculations, GM foods, chemtrails and psychotronic weapons, while the
masses
remain completely unaware; and to sell such things as financial
bailouts so
that the financial elites can impoverish America in their game of
madman
Monopoly. Because
of the media, we have a nation asleep, a nation of sleepwalkers, of
sheep, of
hypnotized soul-less creatures, controlled by psychopathic elites
willing to
deceive their fellow countrymen, bear false witness and commit mass
murders—and
all while making it appear so noble and good. Reclaiming
America: Since
9-11, the countries of the world have enacted anti-terrorist
legislation
allowing any country to seize the assets of any individuals involved in
terrorist activities. 9-11 was a
terrorist act. The people behind it have
conspired to mass murder their countryman, to deceive the public and
then to
engage in horrendous war crimes against foreign peoples and nations. Imagine if America were ever able to really
enforce its own laws and bring about true justice to those who
perpetrated the
9-11 events; the same so-called elites who daily commit other criminal
and
terrorist activities against both American and world citizens. To seize the assets of the perpetrators
of
the 9-11 crimes and their networks would likely resolve the debt of the
United
States of America and bring about a new age of health, wealth, human
rights and
justice. The crimes of the elites will
someday be documented by that same media which they have fashioned for
the
destruction of American society and of all spiritual values on this
sacred
planet Earth. How
cunning of them, to concoct such fabled
airplanes!
I found your
article/forensic-analysis of September Clues most articulate and
acute. By and large, it certainly meets with my full approval as
to the overall interpretation of the many 'human',
behavioral aspects I strived to highlight in my
research-documentary. ....
I am,
obviously, well pleased of your comprehensive analysis
of my documentary, as it is just the sort of
'peer-review' I was hoping would emerge in support of my
longstanding research.
This
article is based upon an attempt to understand the criminal evidences
presented
within the September Clues video
series of film maker Simon Shack (www.thesocialservice.it) The
September Clues series clearly documents
the fraud committed against the American peoples and indeed humankind
by the corporate media in concocting
fabricated images and stories concerning significant 9-11 events. The 9-11 crimes were not committed by Muslim
extremists as the public was lead to believe; there were no high jacked
airplanes, nor passenger airplanes hitting buildings and conveniently
disappearing inside, despite what you
think you saw on your favourite TVs; the
Two Towers did not fall because of non-existent airplane crashes and an
fanciful
pancake effect, but due to a well-executed controlled demolitions; and
the
treasonous actions and inactions of the American military, police and
intelligence communities at the highest levels have enabled these
monstrous
crimes and the 9-11 fraud to be perpetrated against the American
peoples, as
indeed to humankind upon this planet.
The September Clues is based upon the
corporate news coverage as aired both live on September 11th
and/or
as subsequently broadcast. The September
Clues series clearly documents
the complicity of the corporate media throughout in creating,
fabricating and
perpetrating the mountain of lies upon which the official fraud story
of 9-11
is based. Essentially, they have fostered
a delusional (or false belief) system within the minds of the American
public. In fact, there is clear,
indisputable evidence that the corporate media intentional deceives the
American public regarding all significant international events and
national
issues on a daily basis. This is a
consistent, clearly demonstrable ongoing criminal activity by the
corporate
media to maintain a delusional understanding of current events among
the
American public, so as to allow these criminal cabals to not only
destroy the
sovereignty of the United States of America, to impoverish and sicken
the
public, to carry out criminal wars, and to bring about a ‘fascist
world’ system
under the control of these psychopathic networks. However,
the corporate media were
particularly at their best on that day of infamy, September 11, 2001,
when they
actually got to help carry out a mass murder of their fellow countrymen
and
women, as well as of citizens from around the world.
In my
view, the September Clues series is
one of the most profound documentary real investigative video series
ever produced
in the history of humankind. This is
despite the fact that the series is amateurish in ways and difficult to
really
understand. September Clues
rates up there with such a masterpiece as The Empire of
the City which gives a
historical overview of the crimes of these cabals against humankind
through
modern and ancient history. The mass
media of America perpetuates a form of mass hypnosis and fosters a
‘false
consciousness system’ based upon all varied and ingenious usages of
false
witnesses, faked TV images and scenes, faked polls, surveys and
call-ins, the
misinterpretation and withholding of evidences, the use of fraudulent
consultants and specialists from allied criminally oriented
think-tanks, and
all forms of the obstruction of justice
used to conceal the true nature of news events from the American public. The media conglomerates within the US have
indeed participated actively in perpetrating the greatest fraud in
American
history, as they continue to maintain all the frauds and crimes of the
elites
routinely being committed by these international globalist cabals.
There
needs to be an open public criminal investigation of the 9-11 events
and of the
corporate media to bring to justice the true perpetrators of these
horrendous
crimes against humanity and their many minions, and the application of
the
anti-terrorist legislation to seize the assets of these criminal cabals
worldwide—including the corporate media.
This
series can be viewed on www.youtube.com and is posted on the
website www.nodisinfo.com.
The series is labelled as parts A through G and includes
an epilogue. (In addition there are some
other youtube videos which supposedly
‘debunk’ the series.) Each part of the
series runs about ten minutes. The
series is not verbally narrated and explanatory material is presented
in text
and diagrams. This format forces the
viewer to actively attend to the video and to construct within oneself
what is
being explained and its implications. I
have had personally to review this series repeatedly to grasp its
content and
still do not fully understand all the points being made or which could
be made.
Only by watching and listening to the series repeatedly, stopping and
resuming
the action, and note taking, was I able to assess the full impact of
what is
being demonstrated as to the fraudulent nature of the corporate media
video
coverage. Over time, I found additional
unmentioned anomalies, which occur to me with my background in clinical
and
forensic psychology.
Parts of
the corporate media coverage are so particularly peculiar, that one has
to hear
or see something over and over again to order to grasp what is actually
being
done and how ridiculous it is.
However,
as one considers more and more of these ‘oddities’ and ‘inexplicable
elements’ in
the news coverage, not ten or twenty, but hundreds, one reaches a point
when it
all comes together and one realizes what a farcical hoax was
intentionally
concocted to deceive the public—particularly in regards to the issue of
the
fabled airplanes. Elements
of the news coverage when really seen
and grasped then appear absurd. This
is similar to how it is absurd to consider that that
the Towers
fell at free-fall speed into their own footprints as supposedly due to
airplane
impacts, office fires and “structural
damage;” or as absurd as a passenger airliner slamming into the
Pentagon,
folding up its wings to squeeze into an 18 foot wide hole and being
missed by
the hundreds of video cameras surrounding the Pentagon; or as absurd as
the
fact that none of the imaginary high jackers were caught on any
videotapes
boarding any of the supposed airplanes at airports with ongoing video
surveillance; or as absurd that Building Seven, containing all the
criminal
file investigations of banksters and Wall Street financiers, fell down into its own footprints without even
having to be hit by an airplane and without having been pre-wired and
ready for
‘the shoot,’ as they like to call it.
The
official fraud story of 9-11 is already patently absurd and I do not
think that
there is one shred of evidence to support anything of what the public,
like
sheep, were led to believe, again all through their favourite corporate
media
and TV. Almost every one of their
viewers is absolutely sure that he or she personally ‘saw’ an
‘airplane’ crash
into the second tower. Of course, they saw it on their own favourite TV’s, and
of course then, it must be so.
The September Clues series is not only
profoundly important so as to enable us to address the scientific issue
of
whether or not there were any planes at all used on 9-11, but further
and even
more importantly, it documents with criminal
evidence that the major network news coverage was indeed completely
pre-scripted and intentionally designed to deceive the public from
beginning to
end. Indeed, those within the corporate
media are amongst those terrorists needing to be charged for these
horrendous
9-11 events and indeed, according to existing anti-terrorist
legislation, the
assets of the corporate media should be seized by the government on
behalf of
the citizens of the United States of America. These
resources would subsequently be used consciously and
truthfully to
awaken the American public to all the crimes perpetrated against them
and
peoples around the world over the past decades—all that has been
covered up,
distorted and obscured by their favourite TVs and media personalities.
The September Clues series begins by
presenting the
only five live coverage shots of the supposed
airplane hitting the second tower. This
includes shots by the four major networks—CNN, CBS, FOX, NBC and
Channel 5
WBII. These brief clips of news
coverage supposedly document a passenger airliner slamming into the
South Tower
of the World Trade Center and setting off an explosion.
Taken together, the corporate media initially
provided under 15 seconds of visual evidence for such a fabled
airplane.
As it
happens, this fabled airplane is supposed to have entered so swiftly
and completely
into the South Tower that there was no subsequent external visual
evidence of
any airplane parts or sections whatsoever even though there was a
fairly large
hole in the building. The fact that
there was a hole in the Towers is of
course an agreed upon fact. The fabled
airplane entered so smoothly and completely into the building that it
left no
evidence of this beyond that provided by the corporate media videos and
then
subsequently by a number of ‘amateur videos’ supposedly made by
impartial
witnesses, but which also appear to have been created simply in media
studios
by half competent technicians. In fact,
the half-competent is an apt description of the secondary video
sources, which
like the corporate media shots, reveal varied and assorted types of
video
trickery and endless peculiarities.
Part
A of the September Clues series opens
with a
rather shocking statement, noting:
As the film
producer notes, these videos provide criminal evidences which are
verifiable and
which were not so easily removed by those involved to subvert criminal
investigations. Although over time,
other physical evidences have emerged, such as particulate matter
containing
weapons grade explosives used in controlled demolitions and some of the
imaginary high jackers themselves, living and breathing, and wondering
why they
were blamed for such horrendous crimes. But
the video evidences are here to stay, records of the criminal
activities of the
corporate media in deceiving the American public. Fortunately,
their methods are sloppy, their
stories inconsistent and absurd, their actresses and actors not
believable. Although overall a good
performance, these
actors and actresses do not deserve Oscars but something else instead,
such as
criminal prosecution for their role in deceiving the American public
while
helping to mass murder their fellow countrymen.
The
first CNN coverage in Part A is only about a minute long and provides
their
original footage of the airplane which is in sight for approximately 2
seconds.
The CNN
clip begins with the host and a guest witness, Winston Mitchell, who
maintains
that he is at the north side of the Towers. The
camera is centred on a view of the North Tower, while
the south
Tower is obscured behind. When the
‘supposed’ airplane enters the scene, it enters from the right, crosses
the
screen and disappears behind the North Tower. A
second or so later an explosion is visually
evident. This video provides a view of
the airplane passing behind the North Tower.
The two
seconds of the fabled airplane occur while the host is engaged with
this
witness. This is a fairly accurate
accounting of this conversation which is proceeding as the plane is
seen moving
across the screen:
Host:
Winston can you see … are you on the north side there were the mi ,,,
the plane
made, er, contact?
Even in
this 60 second clip, there are numerous anomalies.
I will review each of these according to what
I consider the most significant to the lesser so. Some of these are
addressed
in the video series, while others are my observations and comments.
Further,
some of these anomalies only arise when the live CNN coverage is
compared with
other coverage of the live recordings on network TV or to subsequent
amateur
video of the supposed same events.
1. Firstly and most significantly, the CNN
coverage completely ‘blacks out’ for about a second at the moment of
the supposed
airplane impact—actually there are eight black frames.
Such a ‘black out’ can be produced by a
half-competent technician using a fade out lever and then it can be
simply
reversed a second later. Why, in the
most important moment in a century of news, would CNN, the most trusted
name in
news, have such a momentary blackout right at the moment of supposed
impact of
the airplane? CNN,
in fact, was not the only network to
feature such a bizarre black out at this critical moment. This is a
complete
anomaly requiring explanation as the most parsimonious explanation is
simply that
these blackouts were produced by technicians involved somehow trying to
obscure
particular details of the unfolding scenes or to guard against
something
untoward, like tell-tale indicators
cropping
up on public TV.
Another
peculiar element here concerns the fact that just an instant before the
‘blackout’ occurs and just briefly afterwards, other close up images of
the North
Tower are shown, but it is interesting how these scenes are flashed subliminally before the blackout and a
moment afterwards, before the CNN switches back to its distant
perspective on
the North Tower. How and why were these
momentary alternative perspectives inserted just at these instances
surrounding
their fade out and for what reason? The
effect is to suggest that another big hole is being created in the
second tower,
as there was in the first tower. This
scene is then displayed for only seconds before they return to first
distant view
of the North Tower. This is very clever
camera work! To jump to a totally
different shot, flashed subliminally, then to a brief blackout and
another
subliminal shot, to convince us that something made a big hole in the
Tower
behind our line of sight obstructed by the North Tower.
2. The airplane portrayed in this
video is quite
dark, almost black, which is peculiar as these airplanes are not
painted black
or dark grey and it is a sunny day in New York City.
The image is quite blurred and unnatural
looking. Further, the unnatural
background is whitened and discoloured, given the prevalent sunny
weather
conditions. This supposed airplane moves
across the screen in an horizontal manner, which actually contrasts
with
another live broadcast which depicts ‘a
dive bombing’ airplane which descends from above and varied amateur
videos
showing an airplane banking sharply before entering the building.
3. The host, nor anyone else in the
studio,
where this event is being monitored live, ever mentions the appearance
of a low
flying airplane passing across the screen. The
host is completely silent until a visual explosion is
event, at
which time he does not report another airplane, but only an explosion
inside
the building. This of course is what
we
would expect if these images were being concocted in a studio, as
indeed no
plane would be visible, because the image of a plane is being produced
for
public consumption, by your most trusted name in news.
4. Although we are listening to Winston on
the
telephone across the street from the Towers, supposedly, and we can
hear
ambient voices in the background and we can hear Winston ‘shuffle
about’ when
he says he is going to look outside at what is happening, we do not
hear any
explosions coming over the telephone from Winston, even though he is
reporting
hearing “more explosions.” Why are these
not heard on Winston’s call, which of course they should be? In fact, the sounds of explosions were missing
from all of the eye-witness telephone calls, despite the callers
reporting
these on their phones!
5. It is interesting to note that the host
almost says ‘missile’ instead of airplane in regards to what hit the
first
Tower but he corrects himself in time. (Alternatively,
I think that this may be done deliberately to help create an anomaly,
uncertainty and conflicting ideas about what happened or rather what
was done.) If
we
can have people debating whether or not it was a big plane or a small
plane, or
a missile, then we can obscure the fact that there was nothing, other
than some
half-competent technicians imposing a video image over an ongoing scene.
The
second live network coverage on part A of this series involves the CBC. The CBS clip is a minute and 15 seconds long
with
about one to two seconds of video coverage of an airplane and it offers
all
kinds of bizarre elements and peculiarities.
There is
just over one second of visual contact with this fabled airplane, which
this time,
instead of approaching the Tower parallel to the ground as CNN
portrayed, this
fable airplane drops down out of the sky from above and behind the
Towers. The CBS camera angle is of both
towers but it
is taken from below the level of the Towers, as one cannot see their
roofs. About six seconds before the
explosion is visibly evident, this fabled airplane is well ‘above’ both
towers
and dropping down from above, first appearing at the top of the screen. This is called the ‘dive bomber
scenario.’ Somehow, this airplane above
the Towers descends into the tower within a few seconds.
Of course, this is in total contradiction to
the horizontal flight path displayed on CNN! One
simply cannot have both a horizontal and vertical line
of flight of
the same airplane at the same time. There
are other amateur videos which show over three
seconds of the
plane on its horizontal course, which are also completely contradictory
to the
CBS dive bomber footage.
The
video once again is riddled with peculiarities, especially when
considered in
relationship to other evidences, or should I say fabricated evidences. The image of the plane is not distinct and
instead is like a little blob although it does suggest the appearance
of an
airplane. Unfortunately, I don’t have
the necessary equipment and expertise to more closely examine details
of these
images. This
time, the scene has a blue wash and a
dark airplane.
Host:
I understand that Teresa Renaud is with us right now. Mrs Renaud, good
morning.
If one
listens to this segment several times over, one realizes how
preposterous it
is. Most significantly, this witness in
one breath states “I didn’t see what
caused it” and then in the next breath, says “Oh, there’s another one,
another plane just hit.” Of
course, Mrs Renaud knew what the story was
meant to be and she betrays her prior knowledge of this.
She forgets in the moment and cannot keep her
story straight from one moment to the next. Once
again, no explosions are heard over her
phone line, despite her report that she is hearing them.
Other
elements of her conversation suggest anxiety and deception. Why does she see ‘major flames’ coming out of
the building. This is somewhat unusual
description but one must wonder why she is seeing flames, while
everyone else
including the CBS live coverage is viewing primarily billowing black
smoke from
an oxygen starved fire. Further,
consider how she adds on the word “Explosion”
at the end of her last statement. I
have never heard anyone in my life simply say ‘explosion,’ without it
being in
a sentence or something and she simply says it in a most ridiculous
sounding way
to add it on. She just sticks it on the
end probably realizing that she had forgotten to say ‘explosion’ as it
was written
on a piece of paper before her. As a
clinical psychologist, psychotherapist and having worked with criminal
offenders for 12 years, this whole thing is an obvious hoax and she is
a
liar. Once again, one has to be almost
brain dead, like the majority of the American public, not to question
these
things.
The
third of the live shots analyzed in Part A of the September
Clues series is provided by a feed from a helicopter,
which seems to be located a mile or so from the Towers when a fabled
airplane suddenly
appears on the screen and then hits the second tower.
This time the video image of an airplane is
present on the screen for approximately 2 seconds.
Of course, no one mentions seeing the
airplane ahead of time even though the helicopter line of sight would
have
allowed the pilot, crew and cameraman and to see an airplane well
before the
impact. Of course, in none of the live
clips does anyone ever mention an airplane until after the visual sight
of an
explosion. After the cue provided by the
explosion, the media immediately begin to refer to this fabled airplane. Once again, there is an artificial wash to
the screen. I would think it must be
easier to fake these things if the visuals obscure the background which
would
allow for clearer differentiation of this fabled airplane.
Not only
does the plane appear to pass unimpeded right through this massive
steel framed
building until its nose sticks out on the other side, but the film
producer
then does a comparative analysis of the pixels of the images of the
nose
entering and existing the building, and the images are almost
completely the
same. This is patently absurd; firstly,
that the plane would pass through the building unimpeded and at the
same rate
of speed, and further that the nose of the plane would still be
completely
intact. The only possible way to explain
this is that the fabled airplane is not really a airplane, but an image
superimposed
over the background. However, this
image, because of the drift of the helicopter to the left, is moved too
far
along the horizontal axis. The image of
the plane needed to have stopped in its motion .28 seconds earlier. In
Part A,
the film producer shows how this likely happened. He
also has shots which show how the plane
image is a layering, as at one point, the image of the airplane bumps
into its
layered boundary, and its nose is cut off. In
fact, one can also see the overlapping of
layer edges as the plane enters into the Tower, as if a real plane can
cause pixel bleed. One has to watch the video
to see these things and how phoney they are.
Part
B
of the September Clues series begins
with a live clip from NBC, which has the fabled airplane on screen for
the
longest period of time—approximately five seconds.
This footage is shot from a helicopter which
is above the towers, such that we can see their roofs.
This airplane seems to descend down from above
and behind the towers. The plane image
is very blurry, appearing almost like a blob, white on top and dark
underneath,
and it is shown against an unnatural grey-washed skyline.
The film editor refers to this image as ‘the
ball.’ The image does not feature
distinct
wings.
Just
after the image of the plane blob descends and before impact (which is
outside
of the line of our sight), the screen switches to a close-up of the
existing damage
to the North Tower. This ‘Ball’ version
is available in the NBC archives. We then witness synchronized
explosions in
the North Tower which occur as the fabled airplane is supposedly
striking the
South Tower behind! No one mentions
these visible additional explosions occurring while the fabled airplane
is
supposedly causing such explosions in the building behind.
Once
again, no host or commentator comments on an airplane before explosions
in the
South Tower are evident. Immediately
then, a witness online with host Elliot Walker, the NBC news anchor,
another
news media person who claims to have witnessed the first impact and who
has
been silent in the background, suddenly
pipes up: “Oh, my goodness.
Oh, another one just hit, something else just … a
very large plane just flew directly over my building and there’s been
another
collision. Can you see it? I can see it
on this shot. Something else has just … and that looked like a 747.”
This is
again most peculiar and unbelievable. She
reports a very large plane as just flying directly
over her
building, which somehow she then knows to be a 747, although of course
we do
not hear any of this on her phone line, nor of the explosions which
then
occur. She then states that she can “see
it on this shot,” referring, I guess, to what she is witnessing on TV? But of course, none of the live TV shots
show
anything distinguishable as a 747, as she reports.
Once again, this witness is an obvious fraud
and her story unbelievable, another of the pathological liars
assimilated into to
the corporate media of America, that great country of liberty, truth
and
justice—what a joke.
Such
false witnesses plant the seed ideas that constitute the story line
being
fabricated for public consumption—the high jacking of passenger
airliners by
Muslims. If there were no imaginary
airplane story, then the public who is not brain dead, might wonder,
what
caused such fine Towers to explode and fall at near free fall speed all
neat
and dandy into their own footprint, in such a dramatic fashion. The passenger airliner fraud was to
camouflage the fact that bombs or some forms of explosive devises and
charges
had simply blown out holes in the building, roughly designed to look
like the
damage that a airplane might inflict on a building, and then the whole
building
was brought down in a controlled demolition, all supposedly caused as a
consequence of the fabled airplanes. What
a remarkable fraud!
The September Clues series then features a short
shot of a scene very similar to that shown on NBC,
described as ‘a private VHS tape” which shows the banner of Live
Chopper 4. In this segment, the ball
shown on the NBC
video is not there, but instead, there is a very faint near invisible
object
which streaks across the screen, suggestive more of a missile. Further, this video has a series of line
markers which keep appearing and disappearing on the side of the
building where
the explosion is to occur, and a final marker occurs just at the
explosion site
a moment before the explosion. These
moving marker lines are somehow being coordinated by a lab technician
and are
not present on the same scenes of the NBC footage.
Of
course, this is all quite ridiculous as we cannot have both of these
videos as
simultaneously valid depictions of what occurred. Why
is the missile not on the ‘the ball’
video, or ‘the ball’ image on the missile scenario.
Obviously, the most likely, simple and
parsimonious explanation is that both are the products of media
manipulation
designed to fabricate misleading evidences and then further to mislead
and
confuse people. Could
it have been a missile instead of an
airplane? Or was it simply inconsistent
and sloppy media work and pixelated images imposed on existing live
coverage
shots? Certainly, we still have no
credible evidence for a fabled airplane hitting the South Tower, but we
do have
evidences of the half-competency of media personnel.
September Clues then compares video
versions
shown on the NBC live and on the Evening News. On
these two videos taken from almost the same angle and
perspective,
the planes have different trajectories on the video.
However, the evening news has a much clearer
image of a plane and the background is now completely eliminated and
there is a
grey wash. Further, there is evidence on
both videos of a ‘black spot’ appearing for an instant seen between the
two Towers,
as the airplane supposedly passes behind the first tower.
Although both videos have this black spot
suggestive of a airplane behind, both of the images look totally
artificial and
these spots are at different heights on the same buildings! Obviously, NBC has spruced up its
evening
news to provide a better image of a fabled airplane for a sleepwalking
public—all of whom are absolutely convinced that there was an airplane,
because
of course, they personally saw it on their own favourite TV.
It is
not as if any of these first four live shots, and variants latter
released,
which appear to be second efforts, offer any real evidence of any real
airplane. If there was such a real
airplane there would simply be no chance for such inconsistent,
mutually
exclusive shots and clips, and fraudulent witnesses!
The
fifth of the live shots of the fabled airplane hitting the South Tower
on that
day is also from the same perspective as the different NBC shots, but a
different airplane, different trajectory and with the black spot
passing between
the buildings at again another height. In
this live shot, the background is completely obscured
with a hazy discoloured
sky. Again, the fabled airplane enters the screen from the left and is
in view
for about three seconds. This airplane
is a streaky black blob moving across the screen, but at least is has
partly
discernable wings in several frames.
September Clues series, Part B, then
shifts the
focus to the events at the Pentagon and West Virginia, where we had
other
fabled airplanes. September
Clues features some amusing footage as related to the
airplane that disappeared into a hole less than twenty feet wide in the
Pentagon and of another airplane that disappeared into a fifteen foot
hole in a
field out in Shanksville. Both planes
disappeared with no signs of any major clearly identifiable airplane
parts,
although it seems possible that a missile might have struck the
Pentagon.
Part C
has the most ludicrous video coverage another news media personality,
Mike
Walter. Mike’s early report, on that
fateful day, concerned what happened at the Pentagon.
He states in the first clip:
Now
there is no mention of the cruise missile with wings, but Mike has now
fabricated that he witnessed how the airplane on impact with the
Pentagon was
able to “fold its wings back”—enabling
it to fit into the under 20 foot hole in the side of the Pentagon. To anyone with any semblance of intelligence,
this is a complete affront to you.
One
of the things that really bothers me, is the fact that er, people
constantly
are calling me, and emailing me, and want information about this, and I
am
happy to talk to them. But a lot of them say that, er, well, you know,
physics
just says that this is impossible, what happened.
But what happened is pretty obvious. The
force of this jet hitting the Pentagon at
about 500 miles an hour. When something
hits a concrete structure like that, you know, this belief that the
wings would
go in is just ridiculous. What I saw was
the actual jet going in but the wings folded back like this
(demonstrating with
his hands). So that’s why, when you look
at the hole, you say its not big enough, but that why, the wings were
not
strong enough to withstand the impact, they folded back, and that’s why
the jet
went in, and that’s why the hole that you see isn’t as large as you
might
imagine in another structure.
Mike
Walter’s explanations are absolutely ludicrous maintaining that this
airplane
folded its wings back on impact with the Pentagon within some split
second and
his appearance on this video is most revealing. His
eyes are continually shifting to the right indicating
that he is
lying and try to recall what he should be saying. He
provides only an absurd explanation of his
reports and acts as if he has adequately addressed the facts of the
matter. Anyone who gives any type of
credence to such an obviously dishonest and invented speech is really
quite
mentally and emotionally limited themselves. We
see in the invented stories of these media
personalities, how their
descriptions are so non-sensible, disjointed and deliberately evasive: Like Mrs Renaud, who was “pretty much looking
out the window.” Personally, I have
never pretty much looked out a window in my life. Nor
have I ever heard of an airplane folding
up its wings in an instant, denying all laws of mechanical motion and
of
inertia. Of course, the Hollywood of
news services in America can really concoct almost any imaginary tale,
and they
have enough pathological liars on staff that it is no problem to
produce any
kind of witness one might want.
In the September Clues series, while Mike is
talking, the film director shows on screen the fabled airplane entering
into
the South Tower with its wings conveniently disappearing inside. This is at the same moments that Mike is
explaining, “When something hits a
concrete structure like that, you know, this belief that the wings
would go in
is just ridiculous.” Of course,
this is exactly what is shown as occurring with the South Tower on the
faked
amateur video. Mike’s explanation of how
he saw the wings fold back in the instant of hitting the Pentagon is
far more
absurd and ridiculous even than this. Did
the five ton engines also fold back! This
man is such a pathetic hypocrite and liar no matter
where he
works.
The September Clues series then follows Mike
with what I regard as an honest reporting by the CNN News anchor, Jamie
Mc
Intrye on scene at the Pentagon. This
individual has not yet been scripted and in his naivety actually
reports the
truth! In response to a query
concerning the ‘fabled airplane,’ Jamie responds:
You
know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close up inspection,
there
is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the
building that has crashed in. And as I
said, the only pieces left, that you can see, are small enough that you
can
pick them up in your hand. There are no
large tail sections, wing sections, er, fuselage, nothing like that
anywhere
around that would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side
of the
Pentagon.
Of
course, poor Jamie had latter to recant. How
had this massive airliner which had been able to fold
up its wings
and fit into a small hole, now been able to leave no substantive
evidence of
its existence?
Of
course, Jamie had to subsequently make his reparations for having
actually been
honest on the TV News. His latter
testimony on the CNN News has the banner overlaid, “CNN’s
Jamie Mc Intrye confirms the plane at the Pentagon.”
Oh, yes, the most trusted name in news is at
it once again. Jamie is asked about the
release of some new videos by the Pentagon to supposedly show the
fabled
airplane striking the Pentagon. Very
handy of the Pentagon to obstruct justice by withholding the thirty
plus videos
of the whole affair, but they do now manage to produce two brief and
edited
videos from one particular perspective. The
hostess asks Jamie about this
breaking news:
This
is again a more complete version of the six still frame images that CNN
obtained unofficially back in March of 2002 and broadcast then. The full tape has been something that the
government has been holding, er, as evidence in the trial of Z. M., but now that that trial is over,
they have released the full video, er, and the video, which runs for a
minute
or so, shows what happens just before the impact, and also the plane
coming
into the building. It is from two
separate, ah, cameras, both at the same location, at a Pentagon
checkpoint
entrance and it is hard to see as we are playing it here. It is sort of
stop
action video. Again, very similar to the
still frames that we saw before. But
when you run the video back and stop it, at one point, you see what
appears to
be the nose of the plane just entering the frame. The
very next frame, there is an explosion. And
then in the second angle which is taken
from another camera, a little bit lower down, er, you can see, er, what
appears
to be a white flash, that also looks like the plane.
But again, its not going to be distinct
enough to convince conspiracy theorists, but for anyone with any common
sense,
and er, given all the other evidence we have, there is really no doubt
that a
plane hit the Pentagon.
Jamie
has recanted and his future is assured. And
while Jamie is giving these shallow descriptions of
one frame that “appears to be the nose of an airplane”
(the frame shown below with a barely distinguishable white projection
on the left side of the picture) and of another frame in this “stop action
video,” a euphemism for an edited version, “a white
flash that also looks like the plane.”
Neither
of these images provides any evidence
of an airplane! He then appeals to our “common sense” to accept such ridiculous
concocted, edited and spliced videos and stills as conclusive evidence
of the
existence of a fabled airplane. Even
the video which we are being shown is highly suspect and shows no
evidence of
an airplane! It is as if the public is
supposed to believe his words rather than what they are actually being
shown
visually. If American citizens had
any
common sense they would begin to demand the arrest of these Pentagon
officials
and the seizure of the tapes in total, along with all these fraudulent
media
personalities willing to help mass murder their fellow countrymen and
obstruct
the true processes of justice and criminal prosecution.
I wonder what the going price for souls is on
that ill-fated planet Earth.
September Clues then provides some
coverage of
the ‘fabled airplanes’ which supposedly crashed or was blown up in
Shanksville. This material begins with a
copy of a photograph depicting a mid sized mushroom type cloud which is
quite
symmetrical in form rising from the background. It
simply looks like a bomb had exploded and created a
cloud over the
hole in the field. It certainly does not
look like an explosion caused by an airplane crash landing with
momentum and
impacting the ground to spread debris and fire over an area of land. The crash site itself looks like a 20 foot
hole with some garbage in it.
Of course,
officials happened somewhere to find an Arabian passport and bandana,
and a
fabled victim’s licence, which had expired in 1998.
This fabled airplane, Flight 93, also managed
to disappear so completely that its remnants were gathered up in a few
paltry
buckets and containers. Once again,
there was no credible evidence of any fabled airplane crashing in
Shanksville,
but only evidence of more deception and lies.
Amateur
Videos of the Fabled Airplane
The
filmmaker then examines the image of a dark charcoal airplane. These planes are a silver grey colour and it
was a bright sunny day on 9-11. So how
one would have such a phoney black plane on this horizontal flight path
is of
course an anomaly in itself, but then especially so, when there are
other
videos of the supposed same event which show the plane as almost white. In fact, the video of the fabled airplane
entering the Tower as shot from below the South Tower, shows clearly
the almost
white wings of an airplane. Once again,
the fabled airplane cannot be both dark charcoal and bright white at
the same
time under the same lighting conditions, although of course, one can do
almost
anything one wants within a media studio. Of
course, this makes it complicated if different studios
are producing
different versions and effects to create the TV media’s
image pool of these events. Of course,
none of this would have been
necessary if there had been a real airplane.
There
are all kinds of other anomalies in different videos.
One dramatic video showing the plane entering
the Tower as shot from below is really most peculiar.
The videographer has the South Tower in view
but is including a picture of man who seconds before the explosion
looks up in
coordination with the sound track of an airplane and then down again. Who would normally frame a video of the Towers
in this way to portray this whole event? More
likely, it is being staged with a scripted actor, or
assembled as a
composite in a lab. Another video
features an older Jewish man who is describing the plane impact on the
first Tower,
when the second explosion happens in the background.
Yet the scene behind him is actually being
produced by some type of virtual reality software, which produces the
most
peculiar frames of a type of ‘glass man’ who walks behind the scene and
half of
his head disappears. It’s like a game boy
or computer graphic scene. This is all
preposterous. These witness and events
are staged and fabricated. Further, in
this clip there is no sound of an incoming airplane.
There is
yet no credible evidence for these airplanes but all kinds of criminal
evidence
for the fabrication of evidence by media personnel, news reporters,
actors and
actresses, sound effects produced in sound studios, and so much more. It is all a house of cards, touch it and it
crumbles under any kind of serious investigative examination.
Part C
of the September Clues series
concludes: “Various techniques were used
to produce the 9/11 image pool.” At
least, they might have better co-ordinated their efforts to make their
videos
consistent with each other. Of course,
none of this would have been necessary if there had been a real
airplane, real
witnesses and sounds. One of the amateur
videos even contained the same “Oh, my
God,” sound track element as on one of the TV productions, and
other
feigned swoons and such!
In one
of the amateur videos released in 2006, the “Bob
and Bri” clip, the people had an excellent view of the two Towers
moments
before the second strike. However, at
the moments of impact, the camera jumps around and several frames have
been
edited out, even though the sound track is continuous.
However, on the last frame before the impact,
there is no evidence of a plane whatsoever. But
why were frames edited out of this clip? The
September
Clues editor suggests that perhaps it was to edit out a frame of a
missile,
although I would suspect it was designed to create a reason to believe
that
something had been edited out, such as a missile, when really there was
nothing
there, which would have been evident if the video had not been tampered
with. The
way the video is edited leaves it unclear what happened.
The
Supernatural Physics of Disappearing Airplanes
As it
happens, fabled airplanes are not like quantum particles, which could
be here,
there and everywhere at the same time, exploring all possibilities
simultaneously. An airplane cannot
simultaneously be charcoal and white, grey, a blob or ball, a distinct
jet, a
small plane and a large plane, descending horizontally and vertically,
all
rolled up into one in imaginary space-time. The
numerous amateur and corporate media images of the
planes present a
hodgepodge of possibilities and inconsistencies. Of
course, if there was simply an airplane,
such inconsistencies would not exist and there would be no need to
fabricate
clearly artificial images. The studio
offers a world of visual effects and possibilities.
Of course, in the real world, these amateur
videos can’t all be true as airplanes are not like quantum particles.
Eye-Witnesses to the First Fabled
Airplane
Part
D
of the September Clues series then
presents some of the original eyewitnesses on the five major news
networks. All five networks had first
hand eye-witnesses of the first ‘fabled airplane’ handily on the phone
with
four minutes of the first explosion—“virtually
all of whom were news media professionals.”
Notice
that Sean was unsure of which Tower this fabled airplane has crashed
into but he
describes where it hit in the tower—in the middle.
Was Sean unaware of which tower was which
even though living in New York?
Owen is
supposedly looking at the towers from his rooftop, but makes a mistake
as to
what Tower has been hit. Could he really
live five blocks away from the Towers and not know how to distinguish
the two
even when he is supposedly looking at them? Further,
when the host corrects him, Owen
repeats it to himself out loud—I would say so as to remember what he
had
forgotten.
The next
clip is of Senior ABC Producer Mark Obenhaus, of the “Seeing
is believing” show, who has apparently seen ‘the
incident.’
Mark
then leaves shortly to ‘work the story.’ Don’t
worry Mark the plane was an illusion too, although
the explosion
and hole were not. It is interesting
that Mark describes the airplane, noting that “It just went
directly in creating this cavern like hole. “ It
certainly was peculiar how that plane was
so completely engulfed as Mark notes, as if produced by movie effects
and he is
seeing this from fifteen blocks away unobstructed by the buildings of
the city!
Such a witness is vital to immediately
beginning to create the myth of how an airplane actually went into the building, lock, stock and
barrel, like a movie effect and it conveniently disappears from view.
Back
then to CNN, where Dr. Jay Adlersberg is online, a medical reporter for
ABC’s Eyewitness News, who was also downtown
at the time.
Now we
have a small plane, perhaps a propeller plane. Again
we find such unusual wording, as “it
was very visible that a plane had come in … and appeared to crash.”
Another
first hand witness was Mark D. Birnbach, a FOX TV employee. The Host opens by asking Mark if he was able
to see any markings on the airplane:
Yea,
there was um, there was definitely a blue logo, it was like a circular
logo on
the front of the plane, towards the, definitely towards the front. Um. It
definitely did not look like a commercial plane. I
didn’t see any windows on the sides and, as
far as I knew, when I saw it coming down, I was like, well LaGuardia
(the
airport) is pretty far away and that plane is really slow, and er
definitely it
looked very low, and um, I am completely panicked.
I am freaking out. I can’t
believe what I just saw.
Most of
these so-called first hand witnesses have peculiar elements in their
comments,
not only the er’s and um’s, disjointed sentence structure and repeating
elements. Mark says the logo was “on the front of the plane, towards the,
definitely towards the front.” Mark is
describing something different from the last witness, “definitely
not a commercial plane. “ Note also he describes not
seeing “any windows on the sides,” as
though one could see both sides at once! He
does not say that he couldn’t see any windows on the
side of the
airplane, but on the ‘sides.’
Further,
it is fine for the news networks to air somewhat conflicting stories
and then
to resolve the cognitive dissonance produced in viewers over time, by
coming to
a mutual agreement and story line. However,
even in these first hand eyewitness accounts, we
have
conflicting comments: that this fabled airplane was “a
large passenger commercial jet,” “a commercial jet
certainly,” “a small
plane… like a propeller
plane” and “definitely did not look
like a commercial plane.”
To me,
none of these are credible witnesses. Although
I do think that Mark was freaking out and
panicked and couldn’t
stay on the line, as he was realizing the nature of what he had become
involved
in and its seriousness. Within the media
itself, many witnesses so-called and others are only partially aware of
what is
unfolding, as part of the necessary compartmentalization and
‘need-to-know’
strategies routinely used in such staged false flag events.
Eric
Shawn: I was walking down Fifth Avenue, er, which is close to our
studios and I
heard a jet, perhaps a 737 or a small airbus, er, flying low, unusually
low
over Fifth Avenue, making a right. I am not going to er say, I don’t
know, I
don’t have any reports on what kind of plane hit the world trade
centre. But
people looked up and it made a right toward the, toward the building. John, what we just saw though, was obviously
if that would be was a second aircraft that hit the,er, the, er
southern Tower
of the World Trade Centre. That obviously
raises the spectre of an intentional terrorist attack, here, if that is
indeed
what we are looking at. Er, I don’t know what the reports say, what
type of
plane hit the, the Tower, but I did see a er a jet airliner that was
fairly
low.
Of course, almost 10 years
after 9-11 the FBI still have not issued an arrest warrant for Bin
Laden, as no
direct evidence of his involvement has ever been produced.
(Other than videos of Bin Laden’s confession later
proven to have been faked by the media with a poor look alike!) But
there was
Eric Shawn conveniently witnessing the plane somehow, or at least
seeing people
look up and then summing up that there must be a terrorist attack going
on. Eric is a “specialist” probably from
a Rockefeller think-tank, who happens to specialize in the “hunt
for Bin Laden.” This
is all so phoney and obviously pre-scripted and staged.
September
Clues then features additional clips of witnesses of the fabled
airplanes,
including:
Stewart
Nurick- a younger upcoming Jewish waiter/intern at CBS Early
Show, who states: “I
was literally, I was waiting a table, and I literally saw a, it seemed
to me to
be a small plane, I just heard a couple of noises, it looked like it
bounced
off the building. Then I heard, a, I saw a huge like ball of fire on
top, and
then the smoke seemed to simmer down, and it just um, you know, a lot
of smoke
was coming out, and then, that’s pretty much the extent of what I saw.”
Stewart
was ‘literally’ waiting on a table and then he ‘literally saw’ a plane. Is Stewart seeing these things on paper or in
real life? Then he sees a ‘small
plane’
which ‘bounced off the building’ and he seems not to see the gaping
hole. Stewart is mistaken in
numerous elements of
his report. When one sees an airplane
supposedly at fairly close view, why would it “seem to be
a small plane?”
Don
Dahler, ABC Reporter and War correspondent, on Good
Morning America, reports:
I am about four or
five blocks, just North of the World Trade Centre, and, er, about ten,
I would
say ten minutes ago, fifteen minutes ago, there was a loud sound, that,
I can
only describe it, it sound like a missile, not an airplane. Then there
was a loud
explosion and immediately lots of screaming out on the streets. Er, And I don’t want to er, cause any
speculation, but that’s the only way I could describe the sound. …
This
eye-witness suggests the possibility of a missile attack, instead of an
airplane
attack.
It
was pretty heavily banked, er, maybe 45 degrees, I mean, hard to tell. It was kind of unremarkable because you do
see planes fly through here. It was just
a large plane, like a 727, and, er, that’s the only reason that I kept
looking
and it went directly right into the building. I
thought, you thought, it was going to keep following the
river and
keep on going, but it didn’t.
The Host
then questions:
Jim
responds immediately and with authority: That’s
correct.
This is
obviously scripted and peculiar, not possibly believable.
Was there really nothing remarkable about a
large airplane banking so sharply in downtown New York.
And then, Jim describes it as just entering “directly
right inside the building” as
if there is nothing remarkable about that, but he is more concerned
with his prior
expectation, which had been that it would
just fly up the river. Obviously, Jim was
playing a role and planting the seed idea of the plane just popping
handily
into the building. He was more
authoritative and professional than poor old Mark who was freaking out.
Yes,
Dick is playing this exact role—to “leave
open the possibility that this was a missile attack.”
That is why Dick reports people saying it
sounded like a missile, to leave open this possibility, just as the
waiter, who
was literally waiting, kept open the possibility of a small plane
bouncing off
the building. It is fine for initial
reports of an event to have such incongruities and such, which creates
cognitive dissonance and uncertainty in the public’s mind about what is
happening. The TV media can then present
its final formative conclusions and people gloss over all the
inconsistencies
and absurdities of what they were actually being told along the way. The conspiracy theorists can debate over
whether it was an airplane or a missile, instead of layered images in
TV video
studios and a pool of scripted witnesses. Yes,
a passenger airplane flew directly right into the
building and
disappeared from view. The formative
conclusions of the media can resolve the dissonance in viewers, as when
our
terrorism expert pops up 15 seconds after the second fabled airplane to
start
planting the seeds or memes in the
public’s mind that they are under attack by Muslim extremists. And Eric is an authority of course, an expert
on “the hunt for Bin Laden.”
In the
next moment, Dick is immediately corrected by news anchor, Jim Ryan,
who
explains:
All,
I must say that, er, we have an eyewitness who said it was a large
plane, that
crashed first, and, then, as we were watching the live picture here at
the
studio, we saw a plane crash into,
crash into the other Tower of the World Trade Centre.
And again, let’s, er, just to be sure, “There
it is. The plane went right through the other tower of the World Trade
Centre.
While
Jim Ryan is saying this, CNN is replaying the original clip of the
‘nose out
shot,’ but it is obscured by their banner so that you can’t see
anything to
confirm an airplane. Your news media can
tell you what you are seeing without even showing it!
The next
clip is of Jane Derenowski, an MSNBC producer, who claims to have seen
the
first plane, which she describes:
Well,
it looked, it wasn’t a Cesnna or anything like that. It was a larger
plane, a
mid-sized plane and we could hear it very low, and, er …
(trails off on September Clues)
Next, is
Elliot Walker, an NBC News Producer, a term most appropriate—a news producer, and several others—as
witnesses to one or both of the airplane crashes.
The September Clues series then provides a
listing of those eye-witnesses who reported hearing and/or seeing one
or more
of the fabled airplane crashes and who told their tall tales live on TV. These included:
Sean
Murtagh – CNN Vice President of Finance
Of course, why would
there be any
need for any fakery if there were indeed real airplanes.
Also, if we have an image of a fake airplane
hitting the South Tower, we do not see any other evidence of a real
airplane on
that video, or a missile. How anyone
could believe that the ABC international shot is not phoney is beyond
me. Of course, most people don’t care for
evidences anymore, as they simply parrot what they are told on their
favourite
TV’s. An international audience of
200
million views were shown this ABC international shot through EuroNews. The film editor
notes, “Overall however, most shots betray unmistakable
signs of tampering.” Of course, none
of this would have been
necessary if there had been a legitimate airplane.
Further, some of the unusual effects of the
masked edges may have been used to obscure the explosions going off
within the
building, or according to the film editor, to mask a possible missile. One way or another, the images are clearly
doctored with unusual features needing to be accounted for.
Part
F of the September Clues series then
examines
additional
‘amateur videos’ and provides some information about the people who
submitted
these to the authorities. The film
editor suggests that the ‘live shots’ were likely not to be replayed
too
frequently, all 15 seconds worth, but afterwards, the media released
other
versions of their own shots in addition to a rash of amateur videos
which emerged
after the event. These provided the most
dramatic views of “the airplane crash.” However,
these show all kinds of media manipulation and
anomalies.
The next “Hezarkhani
shot” has another dramatic shot of the fabled airplane,
again with a fairly distinct airplane image, although its left wing
also
disappears before impact. Frames of this
picture also show synchronized explosions occurring above and below the
right
wing as the plane enters into the building. In
fact, there is evidence of multiple charges synched
with the strike
on both Towers.
The series then
reviews additional
‘amateur videos’ and the ‘alleged authors.’ The
first was filmed by Clifton Cloud of Scharff Weisberg’
audio-video
services; then by Scott Myers, a
video/software engineer for ABC TV-US Navy; Naka Nathaniel, of the New
York
Times, a multimedia journalist; Devin
Clark, a motion graphics animator at MTV/Comedy Central;
Sean Adair, of Adair Film & Video
Productions, a “consultant in the arcane
arts of digital media and visual effects;” Kelly
Guenther, a Pulitzer-winning NYT photojournalist; Robert
Clark, a photographer for National
Geographic; Jennifer Spell, a
director/producer at SPELLBOUND pictures; Gulnara
Samoilova, Associated Press photo retoucher, shown
with Mayor
Guiliani; and Thomas Nilsson, photojournalist for Norweigian populist
tabloid
“Yerdens Gang,” All of these shots,
each of which is shown, are credited to professionals in the
photo/video/newsmedia industry! All
contributed to the image pool to be drawn upon by the TV and printed
media
sources.
When
videographer and Israeli diamond dealer and Zionist mole Michael
Hezakhani was
asked how he could have possibly created a plane video and where and
when he
took it, he said, “Call my lawyer.”
What more can one say. The corporate media
and Hollywood do indeed
have all kinds of resources to perpetrate exactly the public deception
of such
‘fabled airplanes.’
Hoax for Export
The international shot
shown most
around the world originated from the Live
ABC broadcast. This
is a ridiculously phoney shot of an
airplane and it has the anomalies along the edges of the Towers—the mask edges, as they are called.
This forgery came in varied versions and on
one, there was a pitch black band running the full length of the Tower,
which
is most unnatural. When the airplane
image hits this band, you see pixel bleed caused by the airplane image
on the
edge of the Tower. Quite absurd. This black mask edge version was actually
shown in Japan on the day of 9-11.
Next is the most
famous video of
the BBC Live broadcast where the collapse of Building 7 is being
reported,
while the building itself is still visible and standing in the
background. Of course, Building 7 was not
even hit by an
airplane and no steel framed building in the history of humanity had
ever
previously fallen in under 6 seconds into its own footprint, due to
‘fires’ in
this case. Reporter Jane Standley is
describing the collapse of the building even before it has occurred—of
course,
because she was scripted as were all the fine actors and actresses in
this
tragic-comedy. In fact, this was 20
minutes before its collapse—a feat for which of course, BBC has never
had to
account. This is similar to how other
reporters describe the second Tower as collapsing before it showed any
evidence
of such. The Tower is described as in a
state “of near collapse,” before
anything like this is visible. Another
reporter describes the Second Tower as “almost
collapsing there” while it is still standing perfectly erect.
The
Epilogue
Evidence
for Airplanes or for a Criminal Media?
Who
Owns the Media?
To
address this issue, I will quote portions of an article published by
Texe Marrs,
dated May 5, 2009 and entitled: Do the
Jews Own Hollywood and the Media? Marrs
is most direct in getting to the core of the issue,
although he
does not go into much detail concerning all of the specifics of who
these
individuals and companies are that constitute the corporate media. (For individuals who are interested in this
issue, there are numerous internet research articles addressing this
issue.) However, Marrs gets to the crux of
the matter
in his notes. He begins by asking:
Do
the Zionist Jews own Hollywood and the media? Are
they using the media to mold and shape American
opinion by
constantly injecting Zionist propaganda and bias into news programs,
movies,
television shows, even children’s cartoons and entertainment?
In a
subsection entitled, What do
Knowledgeable Jews Say?, he notes:
How
about going to top Jews in the media themselves and see what they say?
Take
Joel Stein, for example, columnist for the Los Angeles Times newspaper
and
regular contributor to Time magazine. In
his column in the LA Times (Dec. 19, 2008), Stein says that Americans
who think
the Jews do not control Hollywood and the media are just plain “dumb.”
However,
the problem is not simply that Jews have come to dominate the media
throughout
North America, as elsewhere, but further, as Marrs notes in his next
section, Jewish Media Spew Out Pro-Zionist
Propaganda:
The
fact that Zionists control virtually every media outlet in America is
no doubt
why the American citizenry hears only one version of events in the
Middle
East—the pro Jew, pro-Israel side. This
led Dr. Kevin MacDonald, professor at California State University to
write:
The news
media owned by primarily Jewish or Zionist New World Order folk, on
that day of
9-11, helped to stage the mass murders of fellow planetary citizens,
all while
blaming it on radical Muslims, and as a pretext for waging imperialist
wars
against the sovereign nations of Afghanistan and then Iraq.
This
same Zionist media is even now pimping
their next war—against Iran, justifying it all as a question of
self-defence,
with fabricated evidences and all kinds of experts to talk of the
threat to
civilization posed by radical Islam. What
a joke this would be, if it were not all so tragic:
After almost two million murdered, millions
more
injured, orphaned and desolate, and a land desecrated by war crimes and
depleted uranium, and robbed of its wealth. And
all based on lies—the lies of fabled airplanes
slipping ever so
swiftly into buildings and disappearing from view.
What a world of deceit, hatefulness and
madness these Zionists have concocted for human kind.
And,
who could possibly be more radical, more homicidal and genocidal, than
those
Zionist Jews wanting to create their new world nightmare for humankind
upon
this planet. However, as the motto
of
the Israeli Mossad suggests: “By
means of deception, we wage war.” Oh,
how cunning and clever of the corporate
media to aid in the scripting, illustrating and staging of 9-11.
I often
hear people comment that they don’t think that the media ‘do
their job.’ This would
make me laugh if it were not all so tragic, because, of course the
media do ‘do their job.’ The
problem is simply that people don’t
understand what the actual role of the corporate media is—what their
job
is. Their job is not to enlighten or
inform the American public, but to deceive and mislead them, to
brainwash them
with propaganda and lies, and to hide all the crimes of the elites
being
committed daily against the citizenry of the US, and indeed, against
peoples
around the world. And the media do a
very good job doing just this—deceiving the public, as they did on that
fateful
day of 9-11.
Application of the
Anti-Terrorist Legislation to the Corporate Media
Fuller Text of
Simon Shack's commentary on Fabled Airplanes. Mr. Shack has now
raised evidences questioning even the count of the "alleged '3000'
victims of the day.
I am, obviously, well pleased of your comprehensive
analysis of my documentary, as it is just the sort of
'peer-review' I was hoping would emerge in support of my
longstanding research. However, it would appear you have stopped short
of looking into the full and updated research findings as
published on my website www.septemberclues.info : in the last
two years or so, and with the help of several researcher
colleagues, we have determined beyond reasonable doubt that
the alleged "3000" victims of the day were, by and large (if not all),
fictitious identities 'generated' by a digital database. In all
logic, there was no "added-value" for the perps (only
massive, dire aggravation!) in murdering thousands of Wall
street bankers, brokers or insurance agents in the twin towers - which
were more likely kept empty, rigged for demolition, and brought
down without any human loss. ( see: THE MEMORIAL SCAMS http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.htm )
| Zero Point Radio Show |
Crises
of Humanity |
Critiques of 'New Think' |
New
World DisOrder |
Truth
Media & Resources |